Conducting third-party due diligence is an essential part of a comprehensive third-party risk management program. A strong due diligence strategy provides early-stage insights to make more informed vendor sourcing decisions, tiers vendors based on their potential risk and combines deep point-in-time risk assessments with continuous monitoring throughout the business relationship.
Third-party due diligence is the process of investigating and assessing the risks of working with vendors and suppliers, a critical early step in third-party risk management. Pivotal to ensuring operational resilience, compliance, and security, due diligence requires gathering and analyzing data on the security, financial, operational, and reputational risks a third party could pose to the organization.
While third-party due diligence plays an essential role throughout the vendor lifecycle, it is especially important during the sourcing and selection stages, as well as during intake and onboarding.
During the new vendor sourcing and selection process, conducting preliminary due diligence on third parties under consideration can be invaluable. While you may not have the resources to conduct in-depth reviews of every prospective vendor, initial information collection to gauge profiled risk is important. Profiled risk is a vendor’s potential risk level based on their location, industry, usage of fourth parties, ownership, and other externally observable information such as finances and reputation.
Consider asking the following due diligence questions during the sourcing and selection process:
Vendor intake and onboarding represent your organization's opportunity to conduct more extensive due diligence. Many organizations rely on detailed vendor risk questionnaires to gain a deeper understanding of a vendor's information security controls, fourth-party vendors, and ESG practices. Mature TPRM programs will scope their intake and onboarding due diligence initiatives based on the vendor's profiled risk tier.
Here are a few best practices for conducting vendor due diligence during intake and onboarding:
Minimize Vendor Risk from the Start
Use these best practices and checklist template to build a vendor onboarding process designed to avoid third-party business disruptions.
Effectively managing third-party risk is a significant challenge for almost all organizations. Managing third-party risk requires an approach that aims to understand and mitigate risk throughout the vendor risk lifecycle. Conducting effective due diligence on third parties allows you to identify risks before signing contracts and committing significant financial resources and time.
Third-party due diligence also uncovers hidden risks in the supply chain, like poor ESG practices or concentration risk. A mature program uses due diligence to gain visibility into its third-party ecosystem, identify unacceptable risks, and require remediation.
Effective third-party due diligence is key to identifying numerous risks to your organization. Here are a few key categories of risk to consider:
While your organization may invest significant resources into its IT security program, it can still be enormously challenging to secure your cyber supply chain against third-party data breaches, ransomware attacks, and other security risks. This task gets even more difficult as your supply chain becomes more complex or relies heavily on multinational partnerships.
Your third-party due diligence process should assess potential suppliers and vendors for unacceptable degrees of cybersecurity risk that could jeopardize your critical data or IT infrastructure. This should incorporate an initial vendor risk assessment followed by continuous risk monitoring of the Internet and dark web for information on new vulnerabilities, data breaches, and evidence of leaked credentials.
Consider leveraging a commonly accepted cybersecurity framework such as NIST, ISO, the Shared Assessments SIG, or SOC 2 to scope your vendor risk assessment questions. Then, frame the results of this assessment against a best practice framework that aligns with the rest of your organization’s enterprise risk management strategy.
Corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns are increasingly taking center stage for both consumers and corporate investors. ESG is a particular concern for organizations with many suppliers since extended global supply chains can sometimes involve forced labor, environmental degradation, and/or corruption. Before onboarding a potential vendor or supplier, here are a few questions that can be useful:
Operational risks can take many forms but typically boil down to the third party being unable to perform its contractual obligations. Some third parties, such as those providing non-critical goods and services, may pose relatively low operational risks. However, others such as IT vendors, SaaS vendors, and suppliers of critical components may pose a great deal of operational risk and should have the appropriate business resilience measures in place to ensure continuity.
Consider asking questions during third-party due diligence to gauge the degree of operational risk that the organization poses:
Third-party due diligence can be an expensive, lengthy, and time-consuming process. This particularly applies to organizations that rely heavily on vendors for data handling and processing due to security implications, as well as to those with extended supply chains. Here are a few best practices you can employ to improve the efficiency and efficacy of your third-party due diligence process.
Tiering third parties by their risk level helps focus your resources more effectively during the due diligence process. During sourcing and selection, gauge the criticality of the goods and services the third party will provide, as well as the level of IT and data access they will need to perform the contract. This information will enable you to tier vendors and “right-size” your due diligence program based on the degree and types of risks that they pose.
While vendor risk questionnaires are critical for effective third-party due diligence, they don't capture all necessary information on their own. Add continuous risk monitoring to validate vendor-supplied data and flag new and emerging issues such as data breaches, IT security vulnerabilities, operational disruptions, reputational incidents, and financial problems.
Organizations with less mature risk management programs might assume they have finished their work after completing initial due diligence on a third party. However, new risks can surface throughout the vendor risk lifecycle, including after offboarding and termination. Continuously monitor your third parties for changes in their risk profiles after onboarding, and routinely conduct risk assessments based on the vendor's criticality to your business.
Consider structuring your third-party due diligence assessments around a common industry framework. Doing so will enable your team to assess vendors consistently using similar criteria and provide familiar best-practice remediation recommendations.
Manual approaches to third-party due diligence make it complicated to coordinate vendor assessments, meet compliance requirements, and satisfy different departmental needs. The Prevalent Third-Party Risk Management Platform automates and accelerates the due diligence process while providing a centralized view of supplier and vendor risk to stakeholders across your organization. Learn how Prevalent can simplify your third-party due diligence initiatives by requesting a demo today.
Learn how to leverage vendor risk assessment questionnaires for stronger third-party risk management, including a customizable...
09/18/2024
Third-party risk assessments not only enable your organization to proactively detect and reduce risks, but also...
09/16/2024
Learn how integrating the NIST Privacy Framework with third-party risk management (TPRM) helps organizations enhance data...
09/12/2024