Supplier risk assessment is fundamental to many enterprise supplier risk management (SRM) programs. SRM has become a significant focus for regulators and corporate boards as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ukraine War, and other events have triggered shortages of goods ranging from fuel to semiconductors. These supply chain disruptions have driven record inflation and spurred further geopolitical crises.
It’s clear that proactively assessing supplier risk is more important than ever. Supplier risk assessments can help you understand how threats to companies in your supply chain could impact your organization’s ability to deliver its products and services. Some types of supplier risk, such as performance and event risk, have been understood for half a century or more, while other types, such as ESG risk and cyber supply chain risk, are relatively new concepts.
Before we discuss the specifics of assessing supplier risk, let’s ask a basic question: What is a supply chain?
A supply chain is the sequence of processes required to produce a product or commodity. These sequences can be short and simple—for example, a grower selling goods at a farmer’s market—or they can be long and complex, for example, a consumer products organization that designs and markets its products but then relies on hundreds of third, fourth, and Nth parties for raw materials, assembly, packaging, and distribution.
Supplier risk assessments comprise the backbone of broader supplier risk management (SRM) programs. They involve gathering data about a supplier’s information security and privacy controls, finances, ESG practices, corporate policies, incident response programs, Third-Party relationships, and other factors that may affect their business continuity and resilience.
Supplier risk assessments are conducted by sending questionnaires to key supplier contacts, analyzing the responses, identifying risks and their potential impact, and defining any required remediation or mitigation actions. Assessments are typically fielded during the onboarding phase, and follow-up assessments are conducted at a frequency and scope determined by the supplier’s services and criticality to the business.
If you are beginning to formalize an SRM program at your organization, you can leverage assessments to establish a baseline level of supply chain risk. If you already have a more robust program, conducting an assessment will enable you to measure current-state risk against acceptable levels and identify key remediation activities that you can undertake to reduce residual risk to an acceptable level.
Supplier risk management (SRM) involves managing both IT and non-IT risk across the entire supply chain. Cyber-supply chain risk management (C-SCRM) is a subset of SRM that focuses exclusively on managing information technology risks, such as data breaches, control gaps, and non-compliance with data privacy and information security regulations. An effective vendor risk management program should include a significant cyber-supply chain risk management component, but C-SCRM by itself is not sufficient to mitigate supplier risk.
Cyber-supply chain assessments should include evaluations of each IT vendor’s security controls, information-sharing policies, and privacy practices. In addition to assessment results and evidence about the vendor's cybersecurity and privacy programs, IT vendor profiles should include information about the type, sensitivity, and amount of your organization’s data that they handle or have access to. This can enable you to rapidly identify vendors that pose a high degree of risk to your organization when breaches occur or that may have gaps in their information security programs that weren’t identified during supplier onboarding.
Discover Best Practices for Supply Chain Resilience
Expand your knowledge of supplier risks and get prescriptive guidance for maturing your supplier risk management program.
There are many risks to your organization's supply chain, ranging from weather events that impact deliveries to unethical business practices by fourth- or Nth-party suppliers that lead to reputational damage. As you conduct risk assessments across your supply chain, it is important to understand and categorize the challenges of business continuity and resilience that your suppliers face. Supplier risk categories include:
Breaches, vulnerabilities, missing information security controls, and other cybersecurity threats are critical to evaluate during supplier risk assessments. Unlike physical products, customer data and other sensitive information can be transmitted and retained throughout your supply chain. Attackers can also leverage vulnerabilities in your technology supply chain to directly target your organization’s systems and data. This can lead to adverse outcomes such as data breaches, compliance violations, fines and lawsuits, and reputational damage to your organization.
Almost all organizations today fall under one or more data privacy or information security compliance requirements, such as GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and dozens of others. Penalties for non-compliance can range from fines to personal criminal liability, depending on the infringement and the regulation. Closely related to compliance risks are sanctions, for example, suppliers who have been cited for doing business with state-owned enterprises or have engaged in money laundering or corruption.
Business failures and financial issues can cause severe disruptions to your supply chain, even if the disruption is with a fourth- or Nth-party supplier. Business and financial risks include executive turnover, M&A activity, bankruptcy, lawsuits, and regulations that could impact a supplier's ability to deliver on a contract.
Recent years have shown how badly unpredictable events can disrupt organizational and global supply chains. COVID-19, the Suez Canal blockage, the Ukraine War, and increasingly devastating hurricanes and wildfires are just a few examples of events that caused enormous risk and financial stress to thousands of organizations and governments around the globe.
At one time, organizations could meet the definition of corporate social responsibility (CSR) by giving back to the community through donations of time and money. However, CSR is increasingly associated with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. These include your company’s approaches to environmental sustainability, its relationships with customers, employees, and communities, and how it deals with executive pay, internal controls, and shareholder rights. Working with companies with bad environmental track records, utilizing forced labor as part of their supply chains, or engaging in other corrupt practices can expose your organization to substantial reputational, civil, and even criminal risk.
Suppliers may be unable to meet their delivery schedules, whether driven by business events, economic conditions, or natural disasters. That’s why it’s important to continuously measure supplier capacity, including tracking current order status, performance against order history, supplier responses, and acknowledgments. A proactive view of supplier capacity can help your organization be more agile when a disruption occurs.
Supplier performance risks are closely related to capacity risks, which you can identify by measuring key performance indicators (KPIs). KPIs can include quality metrics, delivery performance, and criteria for meeting agreed-upon service levels. Supplier performance management is easier when you set contractual clauses with enforceable service level agreements (SLAs) and leverage an SRM dashboard that provides enterprise-level visibility.
The Supply Chain Resilience Toolkit
Based on ISO 22301 standard practices, the Supply Chain Resilience Toolkit provides instant access to expert guidance, customizable templates, and structured worksheets.
Different organizations approach managing supplier risk in markedly different ways. The composition, focus, and scope of a mature SRM program depend heavily on the organization’s industry sector and the size and complexity of its supply chain. Given that, five keys apply to almost any supply chain across industries, from retail to technology.
Effectively evaluating your third-party suppliers based on profiled, inherent, and residual risk is essential to your overall supplier risk assessment approach.
Profiled risk relates to the nature and criticality of a supplier's products or services to your organization. For instance, a computer manufacturer’s semiconductor supplier would pose a far higher risk than their packaging supplier.
An inherent risk is an existing risk that the vendor poses prior to any remediation efforts. Examples of inherent risk include poor financial posture, inadequate information security controls, or operational inefficiencies.
Residual risk is the risk that remains after a vendor has taken adequate remediation actions. Your risk management team must determine whether residual risk is acceptable or unacceptable.
Each risk category can be evaluated independently or combined to drive more informed, risk-based decisions and actions. Organizations with a high degree of profiled or inherent risk may require additional risk assessment and remediation efforts, such as:
Understanding and implementing an effective process to accurately determine profiled, inherent, and residual risk is the core building block of your overall supplier risk management program. Before conducting supplier risk assessments, ensure a process-driven framework for scoring profiled, inherent, and residual risk.
Basing your supplier risk assessments on a risk management framework can help to ensure that they follow best-practice guidance and minimize any coverage gaps. Many organizations align to NIST or ISO frameworks, depending on their industry and other factors. Specific NIST guidelines to consider include NIST CSF v2.0, NIST SP 800-53 and NIST SP 800-161. For ISO standards, start with ISO 27001, ISO 27036-2 and ISO 27701.
Assessing ESG risks should come front and center as you evaluate your supply and extended supply chains. Organizations with poor track records related to ESG are at risk for divestment, reputational damage, and customer blowback. Investors and customers are increasingly concerned about issues such as carbon emissions, deforestation, modern slavery, and corruption. As you conduct your supplier risk assessments, ensure you are accounting for ESG risks – not only for your direct suppliers but also for fourth- and Nth-party suppliers in your extended supply chain.
Assessing third-party compliance is a core element of an effective supplier risk management strategy. Compliance should be integrated at every level of your SRM program, from sourcing and selection to offboarding. Conducting an annual supplier risk assessment allows one to identify potential compliance gaps and address them with relevant stakeholders.
Regular assessments also enable you to evaluate your current compliance program against regulations that may have been issued or updated since you onboarded a supplier. For example, the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act includes several critical requirements for organizations to combat modern slavery in their supply chains. Proactively assessing risk against regulations that may not yet be enforced enables you to avoid situations where you may need to switch vendors or require additional remediation before contract renewal.
Assessing suppliers as they are onboarded is critical, and it is equally important to conduct ongoing, regular risk assessments (e.g., annually) to stay on top of emerging risks and changes in each supplier’s operations. However, new threats and weaknesses can arise and impact your business anytime. Of course, it’s impractical and virtually impossible to conduct questionnaire-based supplier assessments daily or even monthly. That’s where continuous risk monitoring solutions can help. By continually scanning and analyzing thousands of sources of cyber, business, financial, and reputational intelligence on a supplier, you can identify and act on emerging risks before they affect your organization.
Supplier risk assessments can enhance your organization's resilience against supply chain disruptions due to business failures, reduce the risk and impact of third-party data breaches, and minimize reputational damage traced to shortfalls in supplier ESG practices.
Wondering how to get started? Learn more about our supplier risk management solutions, supplier risk monitoring service, and procurement due diligence service. Interested in whether Prevalent solutions and services may be a fit for your organization? Request a demo.
Learn how to leverage vendor risk assessment questionnaires for stronger third-party risk management, including a customizable...
09/18/2024
Third-party risk assessments not only enable your organization to proactively detect and reduce risks, but also...
09/16/2024
Learn how integrating the NIST Privacy Framework with third-party risk management (TPRM) helps organizations enhance data...
09/12/2024