Effective third-party risk management can make or break your organization’s financial health. Every company has an intricate web of third-party relationships – including software vendors, critical suppliers, and service partners – that perform vital tactical functions. A failure, breach, or vulnerability at any of these entities could introduce substantial risk to the business.
Third-party risks are discovered through a combination of periodic vendor risk assessment surveys and continuous risk monitoring. Once revealed, these risks need to be prioritized based on their likelihood of occurring and their potential impact on the business. The metric that arises from this calculation is known as a risk score, which aims to present an objective measure of risk criticality.
Risks scored as critical or high need to be addressed prior to those scored at medium or low, much like how critical software vulnerabilities should be addressed first. However, risk scores are not the only way to judge the potential impact of a risk.
Risk quantification is the next step beyond risk scoring. Where scores represent likelihood and impact, quantification showcases the financial impact of a risk. This blog post will explain why risk quantification is important and how it provides the necessary context to senior leaders seeking to understand the impact of managing third-party risks.
Risk quantification is the process of assigning a financial value to identified risks in your business. It goes beyond risk scoring and requires understanding your business’s specific financial condition to make the most accurate calculation
However, to accurately quantify a risk's financial impact, you first need to understand the same information—likelihood and impact—that also make up a risk score. In this way, scoring your risks and assigning a criticality number is the first step in a risk quantification calculation.
Factor |
Risk Scoring | Risk Quantification |
---|---|---|
Likelihood |
X |
X |
Impact |
X |
X |
Financial Value |
X |
|
Representation |
Score |
Monetary Amount |
Risk quantification requires understanding your business's specific financial condition. After all, quantification is ultimately a financial measure, so you'll need to examine corporate budgets and spending to calculate the final number.
For example, procurement professionals know they pay a certain amount of money to suppliers for raw materials necessary for their finished product. A risk quantification exercise would ask: if Supplier X can't provide Y material, then what would the negative impact be on our operations? The answer might be represented in money per day lost from not being able to finish a product and sell it to customers.
Another example is cyber risk. Quantifying the risk of a cybersecurity incident involves calculating the financial impact of downtime and recovery from a third-party data breach or supply chain attack. This is often done with internal systems to advocate for investment in reducing downtime risk, but it can also be translated to the vendor relationship. If a critical technology vendor experiences a cyberattack, you will likely experience the knock-on effects of being unable to do business.
Risk quantification simplifies communication of the real financial impact of not addressing critical vendor or supply chain risks. Many third-party risks are frustratingly nebulous in terms of likelihood, and risk scores don't necessarily communicate how a risk could affect the business if it occurs. That's what quantification solves for.
More specifically, risk quantification enables:
The Prevalent Third-Party Risk Management Platform features extensive capabilities that frame risk likelihood and potential impact in the form of risk scores. The risk scores presented in the Prevalent TPRM Platform serve as the bones for risk quantification with easy-to-understand scoring that indicates which risks TPRM managers should focus on to calculate financial impact. The risk score functionality in Prevalent includes showing the total number of risks based on specific categories and compliance frameworks within the platform.
Figure 1: An example overview of risks based on category, including several compliance standards.
With the Prevalent Platform, third-party risk teams gain important insight into their vendor universe as well as a centralized solution for collaboration and communication with internal and external stakeholders. In this way, risk managers can understand how to best prioritize risk quantification efforts and drive the conversation forward on which identified risks need to be mitigated, and how remediations can impact scores.
Built-in scoring methodology can direct your risk quantification efforts to assign dollar amounts to the most critical risks immediately. Leveraging Prevalent's risk scores as the bones of your risk quantification efforts ensures that you're getting the most accurate insight immediately.
Figure 2: How the Prevalent platform scores risks.
As budgets tighten and supply chains become more complex, it is vital for organizations to calculate the possible financial impact of vendor risks and mitigate the most impactful ones. Risk quantification calculations ensure that can occur, and the scores built into the Prevalent TPRM Platform ensure that you're calculating the financial impact of the most important risks. For more information on how Prevalent can help, request a demo now.
Follow these 7 steps for more secure and efficient offboarding when third-party relationships are terminated.
10/17/2024
Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) has advanced from being an annual checklist exercise to a critical daily...
10/07/2024
Effectively manage third-party cybersecurity incidents with a well-defined incident response plan.
09/24/2024